Hands On With the New Flip Mino:

In case you didn't have enough reasons to worry about videos of your escapades showing up online, Pure Digital has made video posting easier than ever. The $180 Flip Mino, the latest in the Flip series of pocket camcorders, is smaller and sleeker than the Flip Ultra, and it adds MySpace integration for video uploads.


When it comes to size, the thin Flip Mino is the iPod Nano to the $140 Flip Ultra's iPod Classic. Clocking in at 3.9 inches long by 2 inches wide by 0.6 inches deep, it's the smallest model in Pure Digital's popular pocket camcorder line. It's also the most versatile, thanks to the company's new video engine that produces great-looking SVGA-resolution (640 by 480) videos. The unit's 2GB flash drive holds an hour of clips.

At $180, the Mino also comes in at some $80 more than Creative's Vado, a pocket camcorder with which it shares some similarities, including an onboard USB connector, direct-to-YouTube uploads, diminutive size, and comparably slick design. Is the Mino worth the extra 80 bucks? It just might be, if you value video quality and Mac compatibility.

If you've used the Flip Video or Flip Ultra, you'll know how to operate the Mino--even its new features are a no-brainer for a first-time user to operate. The Mino adds touch-sensitive controls, which replace all standard buttons (other than the record and power buttons) found on the other Flip models. These four capacitive touch buttons surround the centrally positioned record button; "plus" and "minus" buttons control the zoom and the audio playback volume, while left and right buttons allow you to select videos for playback. The Mino's full set of controls are rounded out by touch-sensitive play/pause buttons and a delete button.

Although we liked the clean, slick look of the capacitive touch buttons, we found it way too easy during our testing to accidentally play back or delete clips by accidentally brushing a finger against the buttons. You can lock the delete key by pressing it down for a few seconds, but that doesn't go far enough; the Mino's touch sensitivity may be a bit too touchy for some users.

That said, the buttons do seem to solve the problem previous Flip models had, where you could accidentally start a recording while the device was in your pocket--and the Mino fits very comfortably into a shirt or jeans pocket.

Also new to the Mino is the integrated lithium ion battery (previous models used AA batteries), and the location of the flip-out USB jack, the magic component that makes the Flip models (as well as the Creative Vado) so plug-and-play convenient. Earlier Flip units had a flip-out USB connector on the side; the Mino's connector instead flips out, switchblade-style, from the top of the device. It makes the Mino slightly less unwieldy to plug in to your computer's USB port. When connected, the Mino can upload clips directly to YouTube, AOL Video, or MySpace; you also use the USB connector to charge the device's battery (it has no power cord).

The Mino holds some key advantages over the significantly cheaper Creative Vado. For one, the Flip Mino's video-management software (which is embedded in the device, so you don't have to install it separately from a disc) works with Apple Mac OS X, while the Vado's software works only on XP and Vista.

Second, even though both shoot 640-by-480-pixel MPEG-4 AVI clips at 30 frames per second, the Mino's video quality is flat-out better than that of the Vado. This is especially true for indoor, mediocre-lighting settings: The Mino still turns out clear, sharp clips, while the Vado's clips look pixellated, murky, or just plain dark in anything other than well-lit areas. The Mino is your obvious pick if video quality is what you seek, even at almost twice the price.

And if you're a MySpace or AOL Video user, the Mino also has built-in integration with those sites' video players; the same doesn't hold true for the Vado, which works only with YouTube and Photobucket.

Still, the Mino has some drawbacks compared with Creative's YouTube-friendly model. On Windows XP, the Flip software failed to upload my clips to YouTube the first three times I tried it. When uploading did work, I found the Mino was slower than the Vado at this task. Pure Digital explains that the Mino transcodes video footage before it uploads the clips to YouTube, which would explain the slower uploading process; Creative's pocket camcorder doesn't convert the video before uploading.

The Vado can also hold more footage despite its identical 2GB flash drive: While the Mino tops out at 1 hour of footage, the Vado can hold 2 hours of clips (but with noticeably subpar quality, to be sure).

Besides the pocket camcorder itself, you get a few other goodies with the Mino's price of admission: a protective pouch, an RCA cable for watching your clips on a standard TV, a wrist strap, and basic but clear documentation.

Creative's Vado has a bargain-bin price, but as Pure Digital's Flip Mino shows, you get what you pay for: The $180 Flip Mino is the clearly the better camcorder of the two. If video quality is what you're after, or if you use a Mac, the Flip Mino is worth the extra scratch.

Senior Editor Melissa Perenson contributed to this review.

--Tim Moynihan


BEWITCHING WITCH FLIP MINO


ORLY OWL FLIP MINO


RED ON YOU FLIP MINO

The Thinker:

Cat sits and contemplates things for a while:

Where The Hell Is Matt?

Where the Hell is Matt? (2008) from Matthew Harding on Vimeo.


Matthew Harding spent 14 months visiting 42 countries in order to produce "Where the Hell is Matt?", a four-and-a-half minute video featuring Harding (and anyone else he could rope into it) doing an incredibly silly, high-energy dance in some of the most breathtaking scenery around the world.

Meat:

Go Meat Meat Go Meat Meat

There's nothing on television more terrifying than the under-the-desk processed meat obsessive who pops up at the beginning of this Hillshire Farms commercial.

Visit Link

Posted by rcade at 2007/07/24 04:59 PM

Sewage Flows Down Aisles Of Trans-Atlantic Flight:

By RAY LANE / KING 5 News

"I was more nervous than I had ever been on a flight," said passenger Collin Brock.

UNIVERSITY PLACE, Wash.– Passengers on a Continental Airlines flight had to hold their noses for hours as sewage overflowed from toilets while they were high over the Atlantic.

"To be blatantly honest, I was more nervous than I had ever been on a flight," said Collin Brock. The University Place man was on board Continental Airlines flight 1970 from Amsterdam to Newark, New Jersey last week when things went bad.

"I've never felt so offended in all my life. I felt like I had been physically abused and neglected. I was forced to sit next to human excrement for seven hours," said Brock.

That's after lavatories - in the middle of a flight filled with passengers - started spewing sewage.  

"Sickening. It's a nauseating smell. It's very uncomfortable," said Brock.

It was last Wednesday afternoon when his flight left Amsterdam, but roughly two hours into it, the passengers were told the lavatories were out of commission. An unplanned landing in Shannon, Ireland was made to fix the problem.

A pit stop became an overnight stay. The next day, the same plane headed for its original destination of Newark, New Jersey, but just after takeoff, the sewage overflow began. This time, there was no turning around.

"I don't know how you can say a plane needs to be grounded one day for a problem that's not as major as a problem the next day, and it doesn't qualify for being grounded," said Brock.

He says was there was one partially-working restroom on the plane for the more than 200 people onboard.

He also says the flight attendants - who were serving meal service in a stinky, unappetizing cabin - told everyone to not eat or drink too much.

"To be told that we were supposed to monitor what comes out the other end of us was insulting," said Brock. "Shame on continental.  It was the worst flight experience I have ever had."

Continental gave Collin a $500 voucher for a future flight for the inconvenience. He says he's not sure he'll ever use it.